I have been asked to sell this propeller on consignment. I am a WWII aircraft parts guy and this is not my area of specialty. The story is that it is a Fokker D VII propeller recovered by the pilot who shot the aircraft down, and that it has been lightly re-finished. There are stampings on the face of the hub mount area, marked
FLUG. 11657
FOKK. D.VII
There is a stamping on the base of the blade profile, with a crown with a W, HEMBRUG, and 1917.
On the side of the hub area is the following
MODEL K
60 PK
SPOED 160
13
My suspect areas are, based on my experience with artifacts in general:
1. The refinish is very uniform, not an uneven patina as you typically find on an artifact.
2. The difference in the stamping fonts on the side of the hub versus the fonts on the face.
3. The variance in stamping quality between the side of the hub and face area of it.
4. The quality of the stamping on the crown stamp. It is not deep or incisive as the other two are.
5. I know the Model K by Curtiss which was built for Russia, and it has nothing to do with a Fokker D. VII.
I looked at the German Propellers illustrated on the site, and what I see only re-enforces my doubts about this one. But as I said, I am not an expert in this era so am seeking advice. Images linked below:
FLUG. 11657
FOKK. D.VII
There is a stamping on the base of the blade profile, with a crown with a W, HEMBRUG, and 1917.
On the side of the hub area is the following
MODEL K
60 PK
SPOED 160
13
My suspect areas are, based on my experience with artifacts in general:
1. The refinish is very uniform, not an uneven patina as you typically find on an artifact.
2. The difference in the stamping fonts on the side of the hub versus the fonts on the face.
3. The variance in stamping quality between the side of the hub and face area of it.
4. The quality of the stamping on the crown stamp. It is not deep or incisive as the other two are.
5. I know the Model K by Curtiss which was built for Russia, and it has nothing to do with a Fokker D. VII.
I looked at the German Propellers illustrated on the site, and what I see only re-enforces my doubts about this one. But as I said, I am not an expert in this era so am seeking advice. Images linked below:
Comment